***SPAM*** Re: [ofa-general] ***SPAM*** opensm send_trap144 question

[Hal Rosenstock]

On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 10:24 AM, Hal Rosenstock
<hal.rosenstock at gmail.com> wrote:
> Sasha,
>
> In commits 663255db91ecd2baf78b28d77b4397314e5349ca and
> e59489bf06bfed7491b7c3da64ca22ed326b1563, there is the potential for
> trap 144 to be generated. We've discussed some aspects of this when
> the patches were first on the list. There's another aspect of this
> that comes to light now that I've started playing with this. In
> osm_req.c, osm_send_trap144 does not set (or for that matter currently
> clear) the resp_expected flag. It seems to me that a more robust
> strategy would be to set resp_expected to try to make sure that the
> other side sees the trap

by handling the (trap repress) response matched by transaction ID

> (and the timeout/retry strategy is used)

if the trap repress is not received

> There are a number of underpinnings to change to do this. Would you
> accept a patch along those lines ?
>
> -- Hal
> _______________________________________________
> general mailing list
> general at lists.openfabrics.org
> http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general
>
> To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
>