[openfabrics-ewg] Re: How to generate IBEDreleasesusing 1.0branch
Matters, Todd
tmatters at silverstorm.com
Wed Apr 5 14:12:33 PDT 2006
The way it's structured, you will only have to test with one stack - IBED. It's just a little confusing how we get there.
I agree that the marketing group needs some communiqué here.
Todd
______________________
Todd A. Matters
SilverStorm Technologies
(610)233-4809
-----Original Message-----
From: Bob Woodruff [mailto:robert.j.woodruff at intel.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 05, 2006 4:50 PM
To: 'Roland Dreier'; Matters, Todd
Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin; Shawn Hansen (shahanse); Sujal Das; Openfabrics-ewg at openib.org
Subject: RE: [openfabrics-ewg] Re: How to generate IBEDreleasesusing 1.0branch
Roland wrote,
Todd> But both are sanctioned by OpenFabrics; IBED by the EWG and
Todd> Release 1.0 directly by the board. With the establishment
Todd> of the EWG by the OpenFabrics board the consortium of
Todd> vendors hardening the stack became an arm of Open Fabrics.
Todd> If they're both sanctioned by OpenFabrics I don't see why
Todd> both can't, eventually, be a single release process.
>Yes, in my opinion (emphatically not speaking for Cisco here) it was a
>mistake to make IBED part of OF. Unfortunately people saw IBED as
>competitive rather than complementary and so politics forced it to
>be embraced by OF.
> - R.
Putting my software ISV hat (Intel MPI)on, we'd really like to only
have to test with one infiniband stack.
More information about the ewg
mailing list