[openfabrics-ewg] SDP issue with IBED RC3
Aviram Gutman
aviram at mellanox.co.il
Wed Apr 12 00:08:05 PDT 2006
Hi,
There is no point to check SDP now. We released that the SDP code in OF
is not good enough, not stable and has many races. Michael Tsirkin is
recoding some parts of it. We anticipate that within 2 weeks the code
will stabilize and we'll post it.
Regards,
Aviram
________________________________
From: openfabrics-ewg-bounces at openib.org
[mailto:openfabrics-ewg-bounces at openib.org] On Behalf Of Scott
Weitzenkamp (sweitzen)
Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2006 12:40 AM
To: Sharma, Karun; openfabrics-ewg at openib.org
Subject: RE: [openfabrics-ewg] SDP issue with IBED RC3
When these kinds of problems happen to me, I start by debugging with
strace, to make sure both netserver and netperf are using SDP.
________________________________
From: Sharma, Karun [mailto:ksharma at silverstorm.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2006 2:12 PM
To: Scott Weitzenkamp (sweitzen); openfabrics-ewg at openib.org
Subject: RE: [openfabrics-ewg] SDP issue with IBED RC3
Hi
Yes, netserver was restarted with libsdp. I didn't get any error
there.
I face same issue even if i use the default config (libsdp.conf)
. Netserver was started using default libsdp.conf.
For netperf, initially i used default libsdp.conf file but when
it didn't worked i changed it as mentioned in my previous mail.
Attached below is the output from netserver machine.
Thanks
Karun
#################################################################
[st44 Tue Apr 11 15:21:38]# export
LD_LIBRARY=/usr/local/ibed/lib/libsdp.so
[st44 Tue Apr 11 15:21:59]# export
LIBSDP_CONFIG_FILE=/usr/local/ibed/etc/libsdp.conf netserver
[st44 Tue Apr 11 15:22:30]# netserver
Starting netserver at port 12865
Starting netserver at hostname 0.0.0.0 port 12865 and family
AF_UNSPEC
[st44 Tue Apr 11 15:22:33]#
####################################################################
-----Original Message-----
From: Scott Weitzenkamp (sweitzen)
[mailto:sweitzen at cisco.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2006 5:07 PM
To: Sharma, Karun; openfabrics-ewg at openib.org
Subject: RE: [openfabrics-ewg] SDP issue with IBED RC3
Did you restart netserver w/libsdp, too?
What happens when you use libsdp.so with the default
libsdp.conf config?
Scott
________________________________
From: openfabrics-ewg-bounces at openib.org
[mailto:openfabrics-ewg-bounces at openib.org] On Behalf Of Sharma, Karun
Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2006 2:05 PM
To: openfabrics-ewg at openib.org
Subject: [openfabrics-ewg] SDP issue with IBED
RC3
Hi:
I am trying to measure SDP throughput using
netperf. But as soon as i enable SDP for netperf, my netperf is not able
to establish a connection. In my libsdp.conf file, i have included
following
match destination 172.26.16.44/24
match listen *
match program *
Please let me know if i missed out something.
Attached below is the output. Initially without
SDP, netperf was working fine. Then I enabled sdp and after that my
netperf doesn't work.
Thanks
Karun
##################################################
[st45 Tue Apr 11 15:46:03]# netperf -H
172.26.16.44
TCP STREAM TEST from 0.0.0.0 (0.0.0.0) port 0
AF_INET to 172.26.16.44 (172.26.16
Recv Send Send
Socket Socket Message Elapsed
Size Size Size Time Throughput
bytes bytes bytes secs. 10^6bits/sec
87380 16384 16384 10.00 1137.17
[st45 Tue Apr 11 15:46:17]# vi
/usr/local/ibed/etc/libsdp.conf
[st45 Tue Apr 11 15:52:25]# export
LD_PRELOAD=/usr/local/ibed/lib/libsdp.so
[st45 Tue Apr 11 15:52:58]# export
LIBSDP_CONFIG_FILE=/usr/local/ibed/etc/libsdp.conf netperf
[st45 Tue Apr 11 15:53:33]# netperf -H
172.26.16.44
establish control: are you sure there is a
netserver listening on 172.26.16.44 at port 12865?
establish_control could not establish the
control connection from 0.0.0.0 port 0 address family AF_UNSPEC to
172.26.16.44 port 12865 address family AF_UNSPEC
[st45 Tue Apr 11 15:53:42]#
#######################################################
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openfabrics.org/pipermail/ewg/attachments/20060412/db5a6166/attachment.html>
More information about the ewg
mailing list