[openfabrics-ewg] Some intitial test notes on RC5

[Tziporet Koren]

We will look into it.

Tziporet

-----Original Message-----
From: openfabrics-ewg-bounces at openib.org
[mailto:openfabrics-ewg-bounces at openib.org] On Behalf Of Steffen
Persvold
Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 11:39 AM
To: openfabrics-ewg at openib.org
Subject: RE: [openfabrics-ewg] Some intitial test notes on RC5

Hi all,

I've also tested RC5, specifically on a rhel4 u2 x86_64 platform.
Everything
was fine (I had all the pre-req RPMs installed), however when trying to
install
32bit libraries and 64bit libraries at the same time, I get :

% rpm -i i386/libibverbs-1.0.3-0.i386.rpm
     file /etc/ld.so.conf.d/ofed.conf from install of libibverbs-1.0.3-0
conflicts with file from package libibverbs-1.0.3-0


Might I suggest renaming them to 'ofed-lib.conf' and 'ofed-lib64.conf'
or
something in that order?

The OpenFabrics IB stack solves something people in HPC have been
wanting for
some time, running 32bit applications natively on 64bit machines (64bit
kernels). By allowing the i386 and x86_64 RPMs to co-exist it enables
that (and
it actually works to, at least with Scali MPI Connect which is what I'm
testing).

_Or_ a possible better solution would be to compile both 32bit and 64bit
libraries in the same package on x86_64 (I guess the same applies to
ppc64) ?

Kind regards,

Steffen Persvold
Technical Director Americas
tel. 508-281-7100 x401
fax. 508-281-7171

http://www.scali.com/
Scaling the Linux datacenter
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: openfabrics-ewg-bounces at openib.org [mailto:openfabrics-ewg-
> bounces at openib.org] On Behalf Of Betsy Zeller
> Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 2:06 AM
> To: openfabrics-ewg at openib.org
> Subject: [openfabrics-ewg] Some intitial test notes on RC5
> 
> Here's some initial test results from QLogic on installing RC5.
> 
> 1) The tarball contains a broken symbolic link, but things seemed to
> work with this removed.
> 
> lrwxrwxrwx  1 1078 101    39 May 25 14:27 OFED-1.0-rc5
> -> /mswg2/work/vlad/IBGD/Prod/OFED-1.0-rc5
> 
> 2) Installation failed on SUSE 9.3:
> 
> This attempt failed due to the RPM dependency on sysfsutils. This
> package is called udev on SUSE 9.3. In all likelihood the proper
> dependency would be on libsysfs.so.
> 
> Here is the error from SUSE 9.3:
> 
> Checking dependencies. Please wait ...
> 
> ERROR: sysfsutils 64-bit version is required to build libibverbs
package
> ERROR: The sysfsutils package is required to build libibverbs_devel
RPM
> 
> 3) RHEL 4 SP 3:
> 
> This attempt failed due to an unspecified dependency on tcl-devel.
Once
> tcl-devel was installed, it built successfully.
> 
> 
> 4) SLES 10
> We tried this on Beta 8 (will also try on SLES10 RC1), and the attempt
> failed due to a patch failure. The log is attached.
> 
> 5) Fedora Core 3:
> 
> This attempt failed due to an unspecified dependency on tcl-devel.
Once
> tcl-devel was installed, it built successfully.
> 
> 6) Fedora Core 4:
> Like RHEL4 and FC3, except that the machine tested already had
> tcl-devel installed.
> 
> 7) After installation and reboot, the systems were configured with
> less than unsatisfactory IP addresses for the IB ports.
> /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-ib* assigned addresses by
> incrementing the first octet of the eth0 address. This took the
> interface out of the 192.168.*.* protected range. I installed
> the RPMs manually, using rpm -ivh RPMS/*, so this was not done
> by the OFED installer, but rather a script in one of the RPMs.
> 
> This problem really needs to be fixed before we ship 1.0.
> 
> Once the IP addresses were fixed, IPoIB and SDP worked just as
> expected.
> 
> --
> Betsy Zeller
> Director of Software Engineering
> QLogic Corporation
> System Interconnect Group
> (formerly PathScale, Inc)
> 2071 Stierlin Court, Suite 200
> Mountain View, CA, 94043
> 1-650-934-8088

_______________________________________________
openfabrics-ewg mailing list
openfabrics-ewg at openib.org
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openfabrics-ewg