[openfabrics-ewg] Where do contribute new stuff to OFED scripts?

[Jeff Squyres]

One conflict that I am referring to is the continued tone of hostility on
this thread.

I guess I don't understand why you continue to wholly reject the idea of
taking a step back, reviewing our development and release processes (peer
evaluation is *good*!), and then documenting them so that all can see and
understand.



On 9/18/06 1:32 PM, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at mellanox.co.il> wrote:

> Quoting r. Jeff Squyres <jsquyres at cisco.com>:
>> My point in this whole thread is that there is confusion among the community
>> -- not so much about *what* we are doing, but *how* we are doing it
> 
> There might be lack of documentation, but if you are confused, you should just
> ask.
> Before criticising, the right thing is to understand and maybe document the
> existing process.
> 
>> (example: taking a snapshot of unstable libiverbs which was then rolled back
>> late in the release process and then caused other problems -- this should
>> never have happened in the first place).
> 
> The example is bogus - this was a simple mistake, fixed right after it was
> noticed. Further, no one noticed there's and ABI change, and Qlogic did not
> notice that their library in trunk was broken and not working properly with
> libibverbs-1.0.
> So its a clear confusion in what to do, not how.
> 
>> Several members of the community
>> have a different set of ideas in their head about what the process is, and
>> this is causing both confusion and conflict.
> 
> Where's the conflict? Between whom?
> AFAIK so far things were done by concensus.


-- 
Jeff Squyres
Server Virtualization Business Unit
Cisco Systems