[ewg] Re: [ofa-general] Re: [PATCH] osm: bugfix - IB_PR_COMPMASK was used in MPR

[Hal Rosenstock]

Hi Sasha,

On Sat, 2007-09-15 at 22:51 +0300, Sasha Khapyorsky wrote:
> On 12:25 Mon 10 Sep     , Hal Rosenstock wrote:
> > On 9/10/07, Sasha Khapyorsky <sashak at voltaire.com> wrote:
> > > Hi Hal,
> > >
> > > On 12:13 Mon 10 Sep     , Hal Rosenstock wrote:
> > > > Hi Sasha,
> > > >
> > > > On 9/10/07, Sasha Khapyorsky <sashak at voltaire.com> wrote:
> > > > > On 15:57 Sun 09 Sep     , Yevgeny Kliteynik wrote:
> > > > > > Hi Sasha,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > In several places in MPR implementation IB_PR_COMPMASK_*
> > > > > > was used instead of IB_MPR_COMPMASK_*
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Yevgeny Kliteynik <kliteyn at dev.mellanox.co.il>
> > > > >
> > > > > Applied. Thanks.
> > > >
> > > > Shouldn't this also be applied to OFED 1.2 ?
> > >
> > > It does not look for me that any new OFED 1.2x distribution is planned.
> > 
> > Seems like this is an EWG issue.
> > 
> > Should there be OFED 1.2.x fix release(s) ?
> 
> At least I don't know about. In case if there will I could incorporate
> critical fixes from 'master' into 'ofed_1_2' branch. 

Your OFED 1.2 branch, right ? Vlad could pick this up if there is to be
an OFED 1.2 fix release.

> For users who prefer
> to use OpenSM separately from OFED I would suggest 'master' anyway.

Master is not as "baked"/tested as OFED 1.2 although it has other
goodies.

> Seems reasonable?

For your part, yes but still haven't heard on EWG. Seems like there is
not much interest there in maintaining OFED 1.2.

-- Hal

> Sasha
> _______________________________________________
> ewg mailing list
> ewg at lists.openfabrics.org
> http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ewg