[openib-general] [PATCH] optional functions, ib_mad update
Roland Dreier
roland at topspin.com
Wed Sep 1 17:36:38 PDT 2004
Sean> Note that I didn't commit that last patch. I wanted to get
Sean> some other responses first. The only optional calls that I
Sean> did leave inline in my original tree were the CQ ones that I
Sean> considered to be speed path operations. I can easily just
Sean> ignore my last patch, and I'm open either way here...
I don't think it's a big deal either way, but having non-data path
functions be inline makes ib_verbs.h messier and harder to read and
starts us down the path towards having bloated slow path functions
stay inline. So I would vote not to commit this change.
- R.
More information about the general
mailing list