[openib-general] cqe lookup speedup
Michael S. Tsirkin
mst at mellanox.co.il
Wed Jan 26 05:13:24 PST 2005
Hi!
The following patch should get us a speedup in cq polling,
along the lines of what I did for eq polling.
It works fine, but I dont have the fast hardware to check the
actual effect of it, though.
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at mellanox.co.il>
Index: hw/mthca/mthca_cq.c
===================================================================
--- hw/mthca/mthca_cq.c (revision 1653)
+++ hw/mthca/mthca_cq.c (working copy)
@@ -147,20 +147,21 @@
+ (entry * MTHCA_CQ_ENTRY_SIZE) % PAGE_SIZE;
}
-static inline int cqe_sw(struct mthca_cq *cq, int i)
+static inline struct mthca_cqe *cqe_sw(struct mthca_cq *cq, int i)
{
- return !(MTHCA_CQ_ENTRY_OWNER_HW &
- get_cqe(cq, i)->owner);
+ struct mthca_cqe *cqe;
+ cqe = get_cqe(cq, i);
+ return (MTHCA_CQ_ENTRY_OWNER_HW & cqe->owner) ? NULL : cqe;
}
-static inline int next_cqe_sw(struct mthca_cq *cq)
+static inline struct mthca_cqe * next_cqe_sw(struct mthca_cq *cq)
{
return cqe_sw(cq, cq->cons_index);
}
-static inline void set_cqe_hw(struct mthca_cq *cq, int entry)
+static inline void set_cqe_hw(struct mthca_cqe *cqe)
{
- get_cqe(cq, entry)->owner = MTHCA_CQ_ENTRY_OWNER_HW;
+ cqe->owner = MTHCA_CQ_ENTRY_OWNER_HW;
}
static inline void inc_cons_index(struct mthca_dev *dev, struct mthca_cq *cq,
@@ -388,7 +389,8 @@
int free_cqe = 1;
int err = 0;
- if (!next_cqe_sw(cq))
+ cqe = next_cqe_sw(cq);
+ if (!cqe)
return -EAGAIN;
/*
@@ -397,8 +399,6 @@
*/
rmb();
- cqe = get_cqe(cq, cq->cons_index);
-
if (0) {
mthca_dbg(dev, "%x/%d: CQE -> QPN %06x, WQE @ %08x\n",
cq->cqn, cq->cons_index, be32_to_cpu(cqe->my_qpn),
@@ -511,8 +508,8 @@
entry->status = IB_WC_SUCCESS;
out:
- if (free_cqe) {
- set_cqe_hw(cq, cq->cons_index);
+ if (likely(free_cqe)) {
+ set_cqe_hw(cqe);
++(*freed);
cq->cons_index = (cq->cons_index + 1) & cq->ibcq.cqe;
}
@@ -657,7 +652,7 @@
}
for (i = 0; i < nent; ++i)
- set_cqe_hw(cq, i);
+ set_cqe_hw(get_cqe(cq, i));
cq->cqn = mthca_alloc(&dev->cq_table.alloc);
if (cq->cqn == -1)
@@ -775,7 +770,7 @@
int j;
printk(KERN_ERR "context for CQN %x (cons index %x, next sw %d)\n",
- cq->cqn, cq->cons_index, next_cqe_sw(cq));
+ cq->cqn, cq->cons_index, next_cqe_sw(cq)?1:0);
for (j = 0; j < 16; ++j)
printk(KERN_ERR "[%2x] %08x\n", j * 4, be32_to_cpu(ctx[j]));
}
--
I dont speak for Mellanox.
More information about the general
mailing list