[openib-general] [PATCH] CM: new call to return QP attributes for use modifying the QP

[Sean Hefty]

Libor Michalek wrote:

>   The initiator_depth field can translate to either qp_attr->max_rd_atomic
> or qp_attr->max_dest_rd_atomic, depending on whether the field was saved
> as the result of sending or receiving a REQ/REP respectively. So you'll
> probably want {remote,local}_initiator_depth.

For a REQ, the sender saves the initiator_depth as initiator_depth. 
The receiver saves it as responder_resources.  For a REP, the sender 
saves the initiator_depth as initiator_depth.  The receiver saves it as 
responder_resources.  (At least that was my intention.)

>   Also for RTR don't you need the PATH_MTU?

It's definitely missing from somewhere.  I'll add this in.

Thanks for the comments.

- Sean