[openib-general] [PATCHv3][RFC] kDAPL: use cm timers instead of own
Tom Duffy
tduffy at sun.com
Wed Jun 1 13:19:14 PDT 2005
On Wed, 2005-06-01 at 16:12 -0400, Talpey, Thomas wrote:
> At 03:48 PM 6/1/2005, Tom Duffy wrote:
> >I have tested this
> >version using kdapltest in quit, performance, and transaction modes.
>
> Do any of these tests intentionally trigger timer events? I don't think
> they do...
Tom, do you know of a test that will?
> BTW :-) surely you can think of an even more colorful name than this!
Trying to be professional here ;-)
> >static inline u8 dapl_convert_ms_to_kookyib(unsigned long ms)
>
> Shouldn't this routine live in an IB-specific area, not core DAPL?
Well, maybe, if other ULPs want to use ms instead of IB. Do you know if
this is the case?
-tduffy
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.openfabrics.org/pipermail/general/attachments/20050601/858e454a/attachment.sig>
More information about the general
mailing list