[openib-general] Re: kDAPL needs less files

[James Lentini]

I agree Tom. I think the easiest way to do this is one subsystem at a 
time. To avoid us duplicating work, how responding on this thread with 
the subsystem(s) you would like to merge.

On a somewhat related topic, the DAPL linked list implementation 
should be removed in favor of the Linux implementation. 
That would allow us to remove the dapl_llist.c file. 

james

On Fri, 20 May 2005, Tom Duffy wrote:

tduffy> I would be happy to submit patches, but I am not sure that would be the
tduffy> best way to do this.  I think kdapl (dat-provider) should have less .c
tduffy> files, that all the functionality of a given subsystem (ia, ep, ep,
tduffy> etc.) should all be in one .c file instead of lots of little files.
tduffy> There are ones with only one function in them.
tduffy> 
tduffy> So, James, I don't know if you agree, but if you do, how would you like
tduffy> to proceed?
tduffy> 
tduffy> Thanks,
tduffy> 
tduffy> -tduffy
tduffy>