[openib-general] [PATCH] osm.mcfdbs - ignore "empty" MLID or switch]

[Eitan Zahavi]

Hi Hal,

Great thanks.
Applying the patch helps.
Now I am stuck behind another issue introduced by the latest patch of 
incremental Set(LFT).
I will describe it in separate mail

Eitan

Hal Rosenstock wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-12-06 at 08:18, Eitan Zahavi wrote:
>   
>> Hi Hal,
>>
>> Here is the same patch against GIT for your convenience.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> EZ
>>
>> The simulated regression caught this:
>> The osm.mcfdbs have now the format:
>> Switch 0x0002c90000000006
>> LID    : Out Port(s)
>> 0xC000 : 0x003  0x004  0x005  0x006
>> 0xC001 :0xC002 :0xC003 :0xC004 :0xC005 :0xC006 :0xC007 :0xC008 :0xC009 
>> :0xC00A :0xC00B :0xC00C :0xC00D :0xC00E :0xC00F :0xC010 :0xC011 :0xC012 
>> :0xC013 :0xC014 :0xC015 :0xC016 :0xC017 :0xC018 :0xC019 :0xC01A :0xC01B 
>> :0xC01C :0xC01D :0xC01E :0xC01F :
>>
>> Which should probably just be:
>> Switch 0x0002c90000000006
>> LID    : Out Port(s)
>> 0xC000 : 0x003  0x004  0x005  0x006
>>
>> Actually switches that do not have any MCG entry will not be included
>> in the dump file.
>>
>> Signed-off-by:  Eitan Zahavi <eitan at mellanox.co.il>
>>     
>
> Thanks. Applied.
>
> -- Hal
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> openib-general mailing list
> openib-general at openib.org
> http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
>
> To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
>