[openib-general] [PATCH] osm: bug that caused ucast manager to 'hang'

[Eitan Zahavi]

Hal Rosenstock wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-12-15 at 12:04, Eitan Zahavi wrote:
>   
>> Hal Rosenstock wrote:
>>     
>>> Hi again Yevgeny,
>>>
>>> On Thu, 2006-12-14 at 14:58, Yevgeny Kliteynik wrote:
>>>   
>>>       
>>>> Hi Hal
>>>>
>>>> This patch fixes a bug that caused ucast manager to return
>>>> OSM_SIGNAL_DONE_PENDING even if there are no pending transactions.
>>>> Added a boolean flag that marks whether there was some change or not
>>>> (in which case OSM_SIGNAL_DONE should be returned).
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Yevgeny
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Yevgeny Kliteynik <kliteyn at dev.mellanox.co.il>
>>>>     
>>>>         
>>> Good catch!
>>>
>>> Thanks. Applied.
>>>
>>> Is this issue (and patch or a similar one) also applicable to OFED 1.1 ?
>>>   
>>>       
>> I think OFED 1.1 does not have the "incremental" routing patch.
>>     
>
> Right; it doesn't.
>
>   
>> So it does not have this bug.
>>     
>
> Are you sure that the incremental routing caused this to be needed ? By
> any chance, are you confusing this with a different patch ? Just want to
> be clear on this...
>   
Yes I am sure. Without the new incremental feature every sweep all LFT 
tables were set.
EZ
> -- Hal
>
>   
>> EZ
>>     
>>> -- Hal
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> openib-general mailing list
>>> openib-general at openib.org
>>> http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
>>>
>>> To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
>>>   
>>>       
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> openib-general mailing list
> openib-general at openib.org
> http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
>
> To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
>