[openib-general] [PATCH] osm:Fix PathRecord bug in usingMTU/rate/PktLifeexplicitly ignoring selectors
Michael S. Tsirkin
mst at mellanox.co.il
Tue Dec 26 13:38:04 PST 2006
> > > On Tue, 2006-12-26 at 15:01, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > > > > > Should this be applied for OFED 1.1 as well ?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > There are a lot of other fixes all over the stack that might be
> > > > > > useful to people.
> > > > > > But first EWG needs to decide how OFED 1.1 support will be done.
> > > > >
> > > > > I thought that was already decided. Tziporet indicated to do this a
> > > > > while ago (post 1.1 "ship").
> > > >
> > > > The support page. Yes. But not for new SRPMs.
> > >
> > > That's fine with me but not what a previous email said (in terms of
> > > updating the sources) and what has been followed for OpenSM at least
> > > until now...
> >
> > Maybe I'm wrong. I don't have that mail around.
>
> I can repost it if needed (or point to a URL for it).
Why not?
> > Was not the idea that when someone wants to do a bugfix release
> > he puts just these fixes in a package, tests it and releases the update?
>
> There was no mention of the testing aspects in that email.
So, what do you think?
> > If so opensm should be updated only if it will be-retested, and
> > this is only needed before release.
--
MST
More information about the general
mailing list