[openib-general] [PATCH] osm:Fix PathRecord bug in using MTU/rate/PktLifeexplicitly ignoring selectors

[Sasha Khapyorsky]

On 22:45 Tue 26 Dec     , Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Tue, 2006-12-26 at 15:01, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > > > > Should this be applied for OFED 1.1 as well ?
> > > > > 
> > > > > There are a lot of other fixes all over the stack that might be
> > > > > useful to people.
> > > > > But first EWG needs to decide how OFED 1.1 support will be done.
> > > > 
> > > > I thought that was already decided. Tziporet indicated to do this a
> > > > while ago (post 1.1 "ship").
> > > 
> > > The support page. Yes. But not for new SRPMs.
> > 
> > That's fine with me but not what a previous email said (in terms of
> > updating the sources) and what has been followed for OpenSM at least
> > until now...
> 
> Maybe I'm wrong. I don't have that mail around.
> Was not the idea that when someone wants to do a bugfix release
> he puts just these fixes in a package, tests it and releases the update?

What is the point to put all together and have minimal testing time,
w/out any native pre-release testing? Why source version control is
needed then?

If you need to remember where a last release point was just use tag
(or date). And if one will need to "cherrypick" fixes she/he will be
able to use this tag.

Sasha

> 
> If so opensm should be updated only if it will be-retested, and
> this is only needed before release.
> 
> -- 
> MST
> 
> _______________________________________________
> openib-general mailing list
> openib-general at openib.org
> http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
> 
> To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
>