[openib-general] Plans for libibverbs 1.0, 1.1 and beyond

[Roland Dreier]

    Robert> The new trunk, for 2.0, would start in the new tree and
    Robert> the SVN tree could become the 1.0 release tree and any
    Robert> further patches would be done just to fix bugs for the
    Robert> release. New features would go into the new tree in
    Robert> perhaps a new SCM tool.

I don't think it's worth making that move if we're going to leave
everything in one repository.  Right now, we have components like
libibverbs, opensm, mvapich, udapl, etc, etc all in the same
repository, which is just silly.  Why should opensm and libibverbs be
tied together?

 - R.