[openib-general] Re: outstanding patches

[Roland Dreier]

 > IPoIB:
 > ipoib_flush_wq_1.patch
 > ipoib_flush_wq_2.patch
 > 
 > Roland, did you have the time to consider alternatives to adding
 > flush flag to dev_down?

I'm beginning to think this patches are OK, although I'll apply them
in one step: the _2 patch is just fixing a bug introduced by the _1
patch, so there's no sense in having the intermediate step.

 > MAD:
 > mad_port_close.patch

BTW, I think I saw the crash that this fixes while testing the
previous patches.

 - R.