[openib-general] Re: Re: RFC: e2e credits
    Hal Rosenstock 
    halr at voltaire.com
       
    Tue Mar  7 21:26:21 PST 2006
    
    
  
On Tue, 2006-03-07 at 16:20, Sean Hefty wrote:
> From an architectural view, this may require 
> changing the meaning of the value carried in the IB CM messages from 'signifying 
> whether the local CA actually implements flow control', to 'signifying whether 
> the local QP will implement flow control'.
Should this be an IBA spec comment as well ?
-- Hal
> - Sean
    
    
More information about the general
mailing list