[openib-general] Re: Re: RFC: e2e credits

[Sean Hefty]

Hal Rosenstock wrote:
>>From an architectural view, this may require 
>>changing the meaning of the value carried in the IB CM messages from 'signifying 
>>whether the local CA actually implements flow control', to 'signifying whether 
>>the local QP will implement flow control'.
> 
> 
> Should this be an IBA spec comment as well ?

It would need to be if this is the route that we wanted to go.  At this point, I 
don't think that we're leaning that direction though.

- Sean