[openib-general] rdma_cm.h: comment nits.

[Caitlin Bestler]

Tom Tucker wrote:

> 
> So... all that said, I could in fact support rdma_reject on
> an active side connection. But this would effectively reduce
> to a QP --> ERROR and I doubt this matches the semantics
> you're looking for.
> 
> 

And you could send an RST. There's just no way to send any user
supplied private data. It's not just unreliable, it's guaranteed
not to arrive. It's still a long way from the truly desired
semantics, but the wire protocol just doesn't carry that info.