[openib-general] rdma_cm.h: comment nits.

[Tom Tucker]

On Wed, 2006-05-10 at 14:20 -0700, Caitlin Bestler wrote:
> Tom Tucker wrote:
> 
> > 
> > So... all that said, I could in fact support rdma_reject on
> > an active side connection. But this would effectively reduce
> > to a QP --> ERROR and I doubt this matches the semantics
> > you're looking for.
> > 
> > 
> 
> And you could send an RST. 

Yep, in fact that's what many RNIC's do when you move the QP to ERROR
instead of CLOSING. 

> There's just no way to send any user
> supplied private data. It's not just unreliable, it's guaranteed
> not to arrive. It's still a long way from the truly desired
> semantics, but the wire protocol just doesn't carry that info.
> 

Yeah, I think you're correct -- it would be a bogus "emulation".

>