[openib-general] ibdiagnet

[Eitan Zahavi]

Hal Rosenstock wrote:

>Hi Eitan,
>
>On Mon, 2006-10-09 at 12:20, Eitan Zahavi wrote:
>  
>
>>Hi Hal,
>>
>>Hal Rosenstock wrote:
>>
>>    
>>
>>>Hi Eitan,
>>>
>>>When I run ibdiagnet, I get the following:
>>>Loading IBDIAGNET from: /usr/local/lib/ibdiagnet1.0
>>>Loading IBDM from: /usr/local/lib/ibdm1.0
>>>-W- Topology file is not specified.
>>>   Reports regarding cluster links will use direct routes.
>>>-W- A few ports of local device are up.
>>>   Since port-num was not specified (-p option), port 1 of device 1 will be
>>>   used as the local port.
>>>
>>>Node type 4 is not an IB node type
>>> 
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>This message is coming from: osm/libvendor/osm_vendor_ibumad.c (opensm 
>>vendor lib is used by ibis)
>>Why is umad printing this to stdout?
>>    
>>
>
>I sent a patch for this to the list.
>
>  
>
>>>-E- Fail to ibcr_bind.
>>> 
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>Probably the first device first port is an RNIC ?
>>    
>>
>
>Yes.
>
>  
>
>>Did you try using -i and -p flags?
>>    
>>
>
>This works.
>
>  
>
>>>Node type 4 is an RNIC. Shouldn't these nodes be ignored ?
>>> 
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>Probably by osm vendor
>>    
>>
>
>osm vendor returns an error for these.
>  
>
Yes but maybe it should filter them out. I do not see how they can be 
helpful for IB SM or IB Utils ...

>-- Hal
>
>  
>
>>>Also, are IB router nodes supported too by this ?
>>>
>>>Thanks.
>>>
>>>-- Hal
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>openib-general mailing list
>>>openib-general at openib.org
>>>http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
>>>
>>>To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
>>> 
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>openib-general mailing list
>openib-general at openib.org
>http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
>
>To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
>  
>