[openib-general] [PATCH] IB/ipoib: NAPI

[Roland Dreier]

    Michael> Maybe we should just assign EQs to CQs in a round-robin
    Michael> fashion for now, and just hope typical use allocates CQs
    Michael> sequentially.  Worst case, we are back to where we are
    Michael> now, performance-wise.  Roland, how does this sound?

I think what we should do is follow the IB verbs extensions and expose
multiple CQ event vectors, and let the consumer pick which one to use
when creating a CQ.  If IPoIB wants to go round robin itself, that
would be fine.

This is what I tried to set the userspace API up for.  Nothing in
userspace would have to change for this -- the kernel just needs to
add multiple EQ support.

 - R.