[openib-general] [PATCH] IB/ipoib: NAPI

[Michael S. Tsirkin]

Quoting r. Roland Dreier <rdreier at cisco.com>:
> I think what we should do is follow the IB verbs extensions and expose
> multiple CQ event vectors, and let the consumer pick which one to use
> when creating a CQ.  If IPoIB wants to go round robin itself, that
> would be fine.
> 
> This is what I tried to set the userspace API up for.  Nothing in
> userspace would have to change for this -- the kernel just needs to
> add multiple EQ support.

Sounds good.
Fancy taking it up now, or should I look into this?

-- 
MST