[ofa-general] Re: [PATCH 3 of 3] ipoib/cm: separate comp vectors to RX/TX

Shirley Ma xma at us.ibm.com
Thu May 3 11:57:32 PDT 2007





general-bounces at lists.openfabrics.org wrote on 05/03/2007 11:39:43 AM:

>  > Enhance ipoib to use multiple completion vectors if available.
>  > On mthca, this increases netperf BW by some 5% with
>  > same or lower service demand.
>
> I wonder if this is the best way to use multiple vectors in IPoIB.
> Shirley has pointed out that right now we can't scale to both ports on
> 2-port adapters because both ports end up using the same interrupt.
> So maybe we want to target each port to separate completion vectors
> when available?
>
>  - R.

Yes, it would be better to do perPort/perCompletion/perEvent/perInterrupt.
It also helps latency not just throughput.

Shirley Ma
IBM Linux Technology Center
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openfabrics.org/pipermail/general/attachments/20070503/ff34e31b/attachment.html>


More information about the general mailing list