[ofa-general] srp_sg_tablesize related question

[Roland Dreier]

 > Thanks for the information. If that is indeed the case, then why was the check removed? 
 > I see a patch that limited it to 128; not sure if it was ever applied.

I don't think there was ever any check that was removed.

 > What could one use as a max value which would not mess things up, or is that target 
 > dependent?

What are you trying to do?  The default should be fine for most uses.

 - R.