[ofa-general] srp_sg_tablesize related question

[Pradeep Satyanarayana]

Roland Dreier wrote:
>  > Thanks for the information. If that is indeed the case, then why was the check removed? 
>  > I see a patch that limited it to 128; not sure if it was ever applied.
> 
> I don't think there was ever any check that was removed.

Maybe this patch was never applied -
http://lists.openfabrics.org/pipermail/general/2006-May/021775.html

> 
>  > What could one use as a max value which would not mess things up, or is that target 
>  > dependent?
> 
> What are you trying to do?  The default should be fine for most uses.

Some large system users have reported seeing better throughputs with values >128.
I was wondering how high one could go without running into any issues.

Pradeep