[ofa-general] Re: RDMA_CM_EVENT_ADDR_CHANGE notification merge

[Or Gerlitz]

On 6/18/08, Roland Dreier <rdreier at cisco.com> wrote:
>
> > Does the method I suggested of pulling some patches from Jeff's tree
> > over which my patches are dependent upon into the infiniband tree make
> sense to you?


no, I think the easiest thing to do is for me to ask Jeff to merge these
> patches through his
> tree.  We don't have anything else pending in my tree that's going to
> create a conflict if we do that, do we?
>

Generally speaking, yes, you can ask Jeff to pull them into his tree and
merge them from there.

But, we might have few more patches to the rdma-cm, eg something was sent
today (see "cma: add support for TIMEWAIT_EXIT event") and other things may
pop as well. So, can more patches for the rdma-cm be pushed from your tree
if we go this way or a conflict would be introduced? my preference is that
if its not too complicated for you to do this sync, you would merge the rdma
pieces.

Or.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openfabrics.org/pipermail/general/attachments/20080619/f6edb8e1/attachment.html>