[ofa-general] Re: valgrind warnings in libibverbs & PVFS
    Roland Dreier 
    rdreier at cisco.com
       
    Sun Mar  9 20:58:14 PDT 2008
    
    
  
 > This change makes sense, although I probably would have used &resp,
 > sizeof(resp).  There are a bunch of places that use
 > IBV_INIT_CMD_RESP, some of which have VALGRIND annotations too.  But
 > there's a bunch that do not.  Would make a nice cleanup to do them
 > all.
I just audited my tree, and unless I'm missing something, Troy's case
in verbs.c was the last place that still needed annotation.  Or am I
blind?
 - R.
    
    
More information about the general
mailing list