[ofa-general] Re: valgrind warnings in libibverbs & PVFS
Roland Dreier
rdreier at cisco.com
Sun Mar 9 20:58:14 PDT 2008
> This change makes sense, although I probably would have used &resp,
> sizeof(resp). There are a bunch of places that use
> IBV_INIT_CMD_RESP, some of which have VALGRIND annotations too. But
> there's a bunch that do not. Would make a nice cleanup to do them
> all.
I just audited my tree, and unless I'm missing something, Troy's case
in verbs.c was the last place that still needed annotation. Or am I
blind?
- R.
More information about the general
mailing list