[ofa-general] Re: valgrind warnings in libibverbs & PVFS

[Dotan Barak]

Roland Dreier wrote:
>  > This change makes sense, although I probably would have used &resp,
>  > sizeof(resp).  There are a bunch of places that use
>  > IBV_INIT_CMD_RESP, some of which have VALGRIND annotations too.  But
>  > there's a bunch that do not.  Would make a nice cleanup to do them
>  > all.
>
> I just audited my tree, and unless I'm missing something, Troy's case
> in verbs.c was the last place that still needed annotation.  Or am I
> blind?
>   
In the released OFED 1.3, not all of the XRC verbs support valgrind, so 
maybe he is talking about those verbs ...

Dotan