***SPAM*** Re: [ofa-general] infiniband multicast (libibverbs)

[Devesh Sharma]

ok, try to do sequence number check after a slight delay say after 100ns
delay. Is it possible that DMA latancies are comming into picture? Roland or
Dotan can comment on this!

On 11/5/08, Kelly Burkhart <kelly at tradebotsystems.com> wrote:
>
>  It is non-blocking.  I spin, calling ibv_poll_cq until it returns a
> non-zero.
>
>
>  ------------------------------
> *From:* Devesh Sharma [mailto:devesh28 at gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, November 04, 2008 11:49 PM
> *To:* Kelly Burkhart
> *Cc:* Roland Dreier; general at lists.openfabrics.org
> *Subject:* Re: [ofa-general] infiniband multicast (libibverbs)
>
>
> Correction in my post :  I mean you are not considering it as non-blocking
> call (not taking care of this behaviour) and just going ahead with the
> sequence number check?
>
> On 11/5/08, Devesh Sharma <devesh28 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> are you taking care that ibv_poll_cq is not a blocking call, I mean you
>> are not considering it as blocking call and just going ahead with the
>> sequence number check?
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openfabrics.org/pipermail/general/attachments/20081106/fed44d18/attachment.html>