[ofa-general] Re: [PATCH] opensm/osm_ucast_file.c: Fix return status from do_ucast_file_load when file name is not provided

[Hal Rosenstock]

On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 6:57 AM, Sasha Khapyorsky <sashak at voltaire.com>wrote:

> On 06:48 Wed 12 Aug     , Hal Rosenstock wrote:
> >
> > I'm asking about the utility of:
> >
> > opensm -R file
> >
> > (no -U and no -M)
>
> (but then the discussion is not related to proposed patch since this
> breaks '-R file -U lft-file' case)


Right; I was discussing the original motivation for the patch.


>
>
> >
> > Why shouldn't that case fallback ?
>
> Why it should if user is asking to run such configuration?


Because it's broken request (no warning of nothing useful is going to be
done). Don't we try to fallback in broken scenarios ?

-- Hal


>
>
> Sasha
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openfabrics.org/pipermail/general/attachments/20090812/df892189/attachment.html>