[ofa-general] NetEffect, iw_nes and kernel warning
Stephen Hemminger
shemminger at vyatta.com
Wed Jan 28 11:05:14 PST 2009
On Wed, 28 Jan 2009 10:05:29 -0800
Roland Dreier <rdreier at cisco.com> wrote:
> > > but actually I still don't see how it's safe for a net driver to
> > > call skb_linearize() from its transmit routine, since there's a
> > > chance that that will unconditionally enable BHs?
> >
> > It's simply not allowed.
> >
> > dev_queue_xmit() at a higher level can do __skb_linearize()
> > because it does so before doing the rcu_read_lock_bh().
>
> OK, thanks... what confused me is that several other drivers also do
> skb_linearize() in their hard_start_xmit method... eg bnx2x,
> via-velocity, mv643xx_eth. So there are several other lurking bugs to
> deal with here I guess.
>
> - R.
They all look like lurking (and untested) bug paths. mv643xx is especially
bad since it can leak skb. But it should be possible to call pull_tail
if bh is disabled (as long as irqs are enabled).
More information about the general
mailing list