[Ofa_boardplus] Voteable item - Filling Officer Vacancies

[Christoph Lameter]

Hmmm... Maybe this is a bit off topic but the backup slides mention
that officers positions are contingent on their employment by the
promoter. On the technical boards that I served on before there was no
such requirement and I actually moved between employers while on
various boards. I would think that officers primarily act in the
interest of the OFA and not in the interest of the employer. The
interests of the promoter can be voiced as a board member I think. So
maybe it would be ok to loosen that tie? I have sometimes seen
officers being hired by a different company and then that company
joined the organization or some other company on the board hired them.
The officer stayed in position throughout.


On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 3:12 PM, Paul Grun <grun at cray.com> wrote:
> Attached.
>
> This was thoroughly discussed at the 6/22/17 XWG meeting.  At that meeting,
> some changes to the specified timeframes were recommended.  This slide deck
> includes those suggested timeframes.  The base proposal belongs to LANL.
>
>
>
> Technically, this slide deck does not meet the 72 hour rule for action at
> this Thursday’s Board meeting.  (My bad for being late.)  However, the
> spirit of the 72 rule is to prevent surprise last minute proposals to the
> Board.  Given the detailed discussion that has already occurred, and the
> rough consensus already achieved, I am hopeful that no one will object to
> executing a vote on this at this week’s meeting.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> -Paul
>
>
>
> Advanced Technology Group
>
> Cray, Inc.
>
> Office  – (503) 620 – 8757
>
> Mobile – (503) 703 - 5382
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ofa_boardplus mailing list
> Ofa_boardplus at lists.openfabrics.org
> http://lists.openfabrics.org/mailman/listinfo/ofa_boardplus
>