[Openframeworkwg] revisiting the OFWG name

[Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)]

...which is actually a good point: the parent organization is named Open *Fabrics*.

So libfabric is still a good name.  :-)


On Mar 5, 2014, at 12:33 PM, "Sur, Sayantan" <sayantan.sur at intel.com> wrote:

> I like “Open Fabrics Interfaces” the best since it is generic (gives us headroom to grow) and uniquely name-scoped within the Open Fabrics org.
>  
> Sayantan
>  
> From: openframeworkwg-bounces at lists.openfabrics.org [mailto:openframeworkwg-bounces at lists.openfabrics.org] On Behalf Of Coulter, Susan K
> Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2014 11:39 AM
> To: Hefty, Sean
> Cc: 'openframeworkwg at lists.openfabrics.org' (openframeworkwg at lists.openfabrics.org)
> Subject: Re: [Openframeworkwg] revisiting the OFWG name
>  
>  
> On Mar 4, 2014, at 7:09 PM, "Hefty, Sean" <sean.hefty at intel.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> FabricFrameworks
> 
> Open Fabrics Interfaces (Working Group)
>  
> Either of these names seems simple and self-explanatory enough to me.
>  
>  
> ====================================
> 
> Susan Coulter
> HPC-3 Network/Infrastructure
> 505-667-8425
> Increase the Peace...
> An eye for an eye leaves the whole world blind
> ====================================
>  
> _______________________________________________
> Openframeworkwg mailing list
> Openframeworkwg at lists.openfabrics.org
> http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openframeworkwg


-- 
Jeff Squyres
jsquyres at cisco.com
For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/