[ofiwg] OFI WG - minor naming issue -- asking for comment

[Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)]

On Nov 7, 2014, at 12:33 PM, Hefty, Sean <sean.hefty at intel.com> wrote:

> Personally, I'm in favor of using it to describe the overall output of the OFIWG.  The only change I would suggest is to use the plural, "Interfaces", rather than "Interface".  This would potentially allow SFI to apply to multiple interfaces, possibly instantiated in multiple libraries.

+1

-- 
Jeff Squyres
jsquyres at cisco.com
For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/