[ofiwg] RFC command options to ported fabtests examples

Reese Faucette (rfaucett) rfaucett at cisco.com
Thu Mar 26 21:35:08 PDT 2015

IMO there's more value in consistent arguments to the examples and testcases than maintaining look-and-feel of ancestral programs.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ofiwg-bounces at lists.openfabrics.org [mailto:ofiwg-
> bounces at lists.openfabrics.org] On Behalf Of Hefty, Sean
> Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2015 5:57 PM
> To: ofiwg at lists.openfabrics.org
> Subject: [ofiwg] RFC command options to ported fabtests examples
> Most fabtests examples use the same command line options; however,
> there are a couple of applications which were ported from
> libibverbs/librdmacm.
> Should ported examples use the same options as other fabtests programs,
> or should ported apps have their options match the original programs?
> - Sean
> _______________________________________________
> ofiwg mailing list
> ofiwg at lists.openfabrics.org
> http://lists.openfabrics.org/mailman/listinfo/ofiwg

More information about the ofiwg mailing list