[ofiwg] RFC command options to ported fabtests examples

[Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)]

+1

> On Mar 27, 2015, at 12:35 AM, Reese Faucette (rfaucett) <rfaucett at cisco.com> wrote:
> 
> IMO there's more value in consistent arguments to the examples and testcases than maintaining look-and-feel of ancestral programs.
> -r
> 
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: ofiwg-bounces at lists.openfabrics.org [mailto:ofiwg-
>> bounces at lists.openfabrics.org] On Behalf Of Hefty, Sean
>> Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2015 5:57 PM
>> To: ofiwg at lists.openfabrics.org
>> Subject: [ofiwg] RFC command options to ported fabtests examples
>> 
>> Most fabtests examples use the same command line options; however,
>> there are a couple of applications which were ported from
>> libibverbs/librdmacm.
>> 
>> Should ported examples use the same options as other fabtests programs,
>> or should ported apps have their options match the original programs?
>> 
>> - Sean
>> _______________________________________________
>> ofiwg mailing list
>> ofiwg at lists.openfabrics.org
>> http://lists.openfabrics.org/mailman/listinfo/ofiwg
> _______________________________________________
> ofiwg mailing list
> ofiwg at lists.openfabrics.org
> http://lists.openfabrics.org/mailman/listinfo/ofiwg


-- 
Jeff Squyres
jsquyres at cisco.com
For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/