[ofiwg] OFI WG - opinions sought on prioritizing agenda items for next meeting (9/20)
sayantan.sur at intel.com
Wed Sep 14 09:08:35 PDT 2016
OK with me.
From: ofiwg <ofiwg-bounces at lists.openfabrics.org> on behalf of Paul Grun <grun at cray.com>
Date: Monday, September 12, 2016 at 5:49 PM
To: "Hefty, Sean" <sean.hefty at intel.com>, "'ofiwg at lists.openfabrics.org'" <ofiwg at lists.openfabrics.org>
Subject: Re: [ofiwg] OFI WG - opinions sought on prioritizing agenda items for next meeting (9/20)
The problem is that both topics are the fruit of a previous discussion. The question is about prioritizing which to complete first.
Oh, and btw, we are in fact expecting a full report out, complete with 8x10 color glossy photographs with a paragraph on the back of each one, explaining your sabbatical.
Sayantan, okay to defer the code walk through of the Collectives Offload proposal?
From: Hefty, Sean [mailto:sean.hefty at intel.com]
Sent: Monday, September 12, 2016 4:46 PM
To: Paul Grun <grun at cray.com>; 'ofiwg at lists.openfabrics.org' <ofiwg at lists.openfabrics.org>
Subject: RE: OFI WG - opinions sought on prioritizing agenda items for next meeting (9/20)
> Our choices are:
> 1. Defer the code walk through of the Collective Offload proposal,
> 2. Defer completion of the discussion of the Enhancements to RDMA
> for Non-volatile memory.
> Please express your opinions, soon.
I prefer to extend my sabbatical until the end of the year. Thanks for asking.
If there's no conflicts, it seems better to continue the previous discussion.
ofiwg mailing list
ofiwg at lists.openfabrics.org
More information about the ofiwg