[Openib-windows] RE: IBDM and IBMgtSim Proposal Comments

[Fab Tillier]

> From: Michael S. Tsirkin [mailto:mst at mellanox.co.il]
> Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2005 2:31 PM
> 
> Quoting r. Fab Tillier <ftillier at silverstorm.com>:
> > umad in Linux is the functional equivalent of IBAL in Windows, period.
> 
> Doesnt IBAL also include uverbs, ucm and whatnot?

Yes, in Windows all the components are integrated into a single access layer and
work in harmony.  So let me rephrase:  umad in Linux is the functional
equivalent of the MAD services of IBAL in Windows, period.

- Fab