[Openib-windows] DDK to be used
Leonid Keller
leonid at mellanox.co.il
Sun Mar 26 10:37:47 PST 2006
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ftillier.sst at gmail.com [mailto:ftillier.sst at gmail.com]
> On Behalf Of Fabian Tillier
> Sent: Friday, March 24, 2006 3:39 AM
> To: Leonid Keller
> Cc: openib-windows at openib.org
> Subject: Re: [Openib-windows] DDK to be used
>
> Hi Leonid,
>
> On 3/22/06, Fabian Tillier <ftillier at silverstorm.com> wrote:
> > Hi Leonid,
> >
> > On 3/22/06, Leonid Keller <leonid at mellanox.co.il> wrote:
> > > I think, the right solution is to use Vista WDK: they have there
> > > compilers of 14 major version (both x86 and x64).
> >
> > Let me look into this, I think you're right that it might
> be the right
> > way to go.
>
> I looked into it, and my conclusion is unfortunately that we
> should stick with the Windows Server 2003 SP1 DDK.
>
> One of the criteria for the Windows project, and one which
> came under quite a bit of debate when creating the project,
> was the issue of build environment costs and barriers to
> entry. The current DDK can be ordered from Microsoft at no
> cost, while the Vista WDK is not yet released and thus only
> available through MSDN subscriptions, at a cost.
>
> It's important to keep barriers to entry as low as possible,
> so as to encourage community participation. I know this
> seems silly given who's actually participating, but it's part
> of what we set out to do in creating this project.
>
> When I ran into issues like this before, I disabled
> optimizations on those functions that exhibited problems,
> using #pragma optimize. Can we use a solution like this
> until the Vista WDK (or some other DDK
> update) becomes publicly available?
We'll start this way and see what it "costs".
>
> - Fab
>
More information about the ofw
mailing list