[ofw] [PATCH] affinity options
Sean Hefty
sean.hefty at intel.com
Mon Apr 7 23:20:08 PDT 2008
Ok - so the affinity is a bitmask? 0 means default, 1 is 1st processor, 2 is
2nd, 4 is 3rd? Is this correct?
I still don't understand if there's a special reason to get the last CPU.
_____
From: Slava Strebkov [mailto:slavas at voltaire.com]
Sent: Monday, April 07, 2008 11:02 PM
To: Hefty, Sean; Leonid Keller; ofw at lists.openfabrics.org
Subject: RE: [ofw] [PATCH] affinity options
Zero (0) specifies a system default affinity - the default choice.
Last CPU mask has been chosen for customers to override default system affinity
and bind interrupt to last CPU without calculating bitmask.
_____
From: Sean Hefty [mailto:sean.hefty at intel.com]
Sent: Monday, April 07, 2008 9:22 PM
To: 'Leonid Keller'; Slava Strebkov; ofw at lists.openfabrics.org
Subject: RE: [ofw] [PATCH] affinity options
I didn't see any response to the comments regarding the need to define the
special value of 0xFFFFFFFF. Is there a reason why we can't just use an index
and let the user specify 0? (I.e. Is there a reason why we need a way to get
the last cpu over the first?)
_____
From: ofw-bounces at lists.openfabrics.org
[mailto:ofw-bounces at lists.openfabrics.org] On Behalf Of Leonid Keller
Sent: Monday, April 07, 2008 4:20 AM
To: Slava Strebkov; ofw at lists.openfabrics.org
Subject: RE: [ofw] [PATCH] affinity options
Done in rev. 1047, thank you.
_____
From: ofw-bounces at lists.openfabrics.org
[mailto:ofw-bounces at lists.openfabrics.org] On Behalf Of Slava Strebkov
Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 5:47 PM
To: ofw at lists.openfabrics.org
Subject: [ofw] [PATCH] affinity options
Hi,
The following patch provides a way to user to specify the cpu affinity mask.
Setting the value of ProcessorAffinity to FFFFFFFF binds interrupt to last cpu
on machine.
Index: hw/mthca/kernel/hca_pnp.c
===================================================================
--- hw/mthca/kernel/hca_pnp.c (revision 1031)
+++ hw/mthca/kernel/hca_pnp.c (working copy)
@@ -678,6 +678,29 @@
if( pHcaRes->Type == CmResourceTypeInterrupt )
{
p_ext->interruptInfo = *pHostRes;
+ if ( g_processor_affinity == 0xFFFFFFFF )
+ {
+ /*
+ * Calculate the mask of the last
processor
+ */
+ KAFFINITY
n_active_processors_bitmask;
+ uint32_t
last_processor_mask = 0 , tmp_processor_mask = 1;
+
+ n_active_processors_bitmask =
KeQueryActiveProcessors();
+ while ( tmp_processor_mask & n_active_processors_bitmask )
+ {
+
last_processor_mask = tmp_processor_mask;
+
tmp_processor_mask = tmp_processor_mask << 1;
+ }
+
p_ext->interruptInfo.u.Interrupt.Affinity = last_processor_mask;
+ }
+ else if (g_processor_affinity != 0)
+ {
+
p_ext->interruptInfo.u.Interrupt.Affinity = g_processor_affinity;
+ }
+ HCA_PRINT( TRACE_LEVEL_INFORMATION,
HCA_DBG_PNP,("Set Interrupt affinity to : 0x%08X\n",
+
(int)p_ext->interruptInfo.u.Interrupt.Affinity ));
+
continue;
}
Index: hw/mthca/kernel/mt_l2w.c
===================================================================
--- hw/mthca/kernel/mt_l2w.c (revision 1031)
+++ hw/mthca/kernel/mt_l2w.c (working copy)
@@ -118,7 +118,7 @@
(BOOLEAN)((int_info->Flags ==
CM_RESOURCE_INTERRUPT_LATCHED) ?
Latched : LevelSensitive),
/* interrupt type: LATCHED or LEVEL */
(BOOLEAN)(int_info->ShareDisposition ==
CmResourceShareShared), /* vector shared or not */
- g_processor_affinity ? g_processor_affinity :
(KAFFINITY)int_info->u.Interrupt.Affinity, /* interrupt affinity */
+ (KAFFINITY)int_info->u.Interrupt.Affinity, /*
interrupt affinity */
FALSE
/* whether to save Float registers */
);
Slava Strebkov
SW Engineer
Voltaire
099718750
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openfabrics.org/pipermail/ofw/attachments/20080407/a71394ea/attachment.html>
More information about the ofw
mailing list