[ofw] [PATCH] affinity options
Smith, Stan
stan.smith at intel.com
Tue Apr 8 06:40:11 PDT 2008
________________________________
From: ofw-bounces at lists.openfabrics.org
[mailto:ofw-bounces at lists.openfabrics.org] On Behalf Of Sean Hefty
Sent: Monday, April 07, 2008 11:20 PM
To: 'Slava Strebkov'; Leonid Keller; ofw at lists.openfabrics.org
Subject: RE: [ofw] [PATCH] affinity options
Ok - so the affinity is a bitmask? 0 means default, 1 is 1st processor,
2 is 2nd, 4 is 3rd? Is this correct?
I still don't understand if there's a special reason to get the last
CPU.
cache foot print optimization.
________________________________
From: Slava Strebkov [mailto:slavas at voltaire.com]
Sent: Monday, April 07, 2008 11:02 PM
To: Hefty, Sean; Leonid Keller; ofw at lists.openfabrics.org
Subject: RE: [ofw] [PATCH] affinity options
Zero (0) specifies a system default affinity - the default choice.
Last CPU mask has been chosen for customers to override default system
affinity and bind interrupt to last CPU without calculating bitmask.
________________________________
From: Sean Hefty [mailto:sean.hefty at intel.com]
Sent: Monday, April 07, 2008 9:22 PM
To: 'Leonid Keller'; Slava Strebkov; ofw at lists.openfabrics.org
Subject: RE: [ofw] [PATCH] affinity options
I didn't see any response to the comments regarding the need to define
the special value of 0xFFFFFFFF. Is there a reason why we can't just
use an index and let the user specify 0? (I.e. Is there a reason why we
need a way to get the last cpu over the first?)
________________________________
From: ofw-bounces at lists.openfabrics.org
[mailto:ofw-bounces at lists.openfabrics.org] On Behalf Of Leonid Keller
Sent: Monday, April 07, 2008 4:20 AM
To: Slava Strebkov; ofw at lists.openfabrics.org
Subject: RE: [ofw] [PATCH] affinity options
Done in rev. 1047, thank you.
________________________________
From: ofw-bounces at lists.openfabrics.org
[mailto:ofw-bounces at lists.openfabrics.org] On Behalf Of Slava Strebkov
Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 5:47 PM
To: ofw at lists.openfabrics.org
Subject: [ofw] [PATCH] affinity options
Hi,
The following patch provides a way to user to specify the cpu
affinity mask.
Setting the value of ProcessorAffinity to FFFFFFFF binds
interrupt to last cpu on machine.
Index: hw/mthca/kernel/hca_pnp.c
===================================================================
--- hw/mthca/kernel/hca_pnp.c (revision 1031)
+++ hw/mthca/kernel/hca_pnp.c (working copy)
@@ -678,6 +678,29 @@
if( pHcaRes->Type ==
CmResourceTypeInterrupt )
{
p_ext->interruptInfo =
*pHostRes;
+ if ( g_processor_affinity == 0xFFFFFFFF )
+ {
+ /*
+ * Calculate the
mask of the last processor
+ */
+ KAFFINITY
n_active_processors_bitmask;
+ uint32_t
last_processor_mask = 0 , tmp_processor_mask = 1;
+
+
n_active_processors_bitmask = KeQueryActiveProcessors();
+ while ( tmp_processor_mask &
n_active_processors_bitmask )
+ {
+
last_processor_mask = tmp_processor_mask;
+
tmp_processor_mask = tmp_processor_mask << 1;
+ }
+
p_ext->interruptInfo.u.Interrupt.Affinity = last_processor_mask;
+ }
+ else if (g_processor_affinity
!= 0)
+ {
+
p_ext->interruptInfo.u.Interrupt.Affinity = g_processor_affinity;
+ }
+ HCA_PRINT(
TRACE_LEVEL_INFORMATION, HCA_DBG_PNP,("Set Interrupt affinity to :
0x%08X\n",
+
(int)p_ext->interruptInfo.u.Interrupt.Affinity ));
+
continue;
}
Index: hw/mthca/kernel/mt_l2w.c
===================================================================
--- hw/mthca/kernel/mt_l2w.c (revision 1031)
+++ hw/mthca/kernel/mt_l2w.c (working copy)
@@ -118,7 +118,7 @@
(BOOLEAN)((int_info->Flags ==
CM_RESOURCE_INTERRUPT_LATCHED) ?
Latched : LevelSensitive),
/* interrupt type: LATCHED or LEVEL */
(BOOLEAN)(int_info->ShareDisposition ==
CmResourceShareShared), /* vector shared or not */
- g_processor_affinity ?
g_processor_affinity : (KAFFINITY)int_info->u.Interrupt.Affinity,
/* interrupt affinity */
+
(KAFFINITY)int_info->u.Interrupt.Affinity, /* interrupt
affinity */
FALSE
/* whether to save Float registers */
);
Slava Strebkov
SW Engineer
Voltaire
099718750
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openfabrics.org/pipermail/ofw/attachments/20080408/09999671/attachment.html>
More information about the ofw
mailing list