[ofw] RE: [PATCH] Kill ATS registration in IPoIB

Sean Hefty sean.hefty at intel.com
Thu Jul 3 10:03:48 PDT 2008


>> It seems to me that DAPL is still using the ATS registrations.
>>
>> Do we all agree that ATS can be removed from the code?
>
>Not until after WinOF 2.0 release.
>Thank you.

Doesn't the socket CM eliminate the need for ATS?  Or is that just one of the
DAPL connection options?




More information about the ofw mailing list