[ofw] RE: [PATCH] Kill ATS registration in IPoIB

[Smith, Stan]

Hefty, Sean wrote:
>>> It seems to me that DAPL is still using the ATS registrations.
>>> 
>>> Do we all agree that ATS can be removed from the code?
>> 
>> Not until after WinOF 2.0 release.
>> Thank you.
> 
> Doesn't the socket CM eliminate the need for ATS?  Or is that just
> one of the DAPL connection options?

Yes - socket CM is one of two DAPL connections options, it does not use
ATS.

Oops, I confused history with the present w.r.t. DAPL ibal provider and
it's use of ATS.
winDAPL (ibal provider) uses the SA to provide an ATS service.
Prior to removing ATS from the svn code base, please identify code to be
removed; I've lost the original patch.

Thanks,

Stan.