[ofw] RE: [PATCH] Kill ATS registration in IPoIB

[Tzachi Dar]

Hi stan attached is the patch that Fab has created.

Can I check this in?

Thanks
Tzachi

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Smith, Stan [mailto:stan.smith at intel.com] 
> Sent: Friday, July 04, 2008 12:00 AM
> To: Hefty, Sean; Tzachi Dar; Fab Tillier; ofw at lists.openfabrics.org
> Subject: RE: [ofw] RE: [PATCH] Kill ATS registration in IPoIB
> 
> Hefty, Sean wrote:
> >>> It seems to me that DAPL is still using the ATS registrations.
> >>> 
> >>> Do we all agree that ATS can be removed from the code?
> >> 
> >> Not until after WinOF 2.0 release.
> >> Thank you.
> > 
> > Doesn't the socket CM eliminate the need for ATS?  Or is 
> that just one 
> > of the DAPL connection options?
> 
> Yes - socket CM is one of two DAPL connections options, it 
> does not use ATS.
> 
> Oops, I confused history with the present w.r.t. DAPL ibal 
> provider and it's use of ATS.
> winDAPL (ibal provider) uses the SA to provide an ATS service.
> Prior to removing ATS from the svn code base, please identify 
> code to be removed; I've lost the original patch.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Stan.
> 
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded message was scrubbed...
From: "Fab Tillier" <ftillier at windows.microsoft.com>
Subject: [ofw] [PATCH] Kill ATS registration in IPoIB
Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2008 22:18:05 +0300
Size: 41005
URL: <http://lists.openfabrics.org/pipermail/ofw/attachments/20080704/b2b33a67/attachment.mht>