[ofw] please stop referencing internal development trees in	svnlogmessages
    Ishai Rabinovitz 
    ishai at mellanox.co.il
       
    Tue May 20 10:09:18 PDT 2008
    
    
  
We want to have a bi-directional pointers.
I cannot see what is the problem with an internal remark added to the
description.
Ishai 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ofw-bounces at lists.openfabrics.org 
> [mailto:ofw-bounces at lists.openfabrics.org] On Behalf Of Sean Hefty
> Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2008 7:53 PM
> To: Leonid Keller; ofw at lists.openfabrics.org
> Subject: RE: [ofw] please stop referencing internal 
> development trees in svnlogmessages
> 
> >I believe, that not only we (Mellanox) are using internal trees for 
> >development and testing.
> >The mentioned referencing is very usefull for maintaining 
> >synchronization between the internal and WINOF's tree.
> >So my suggestion is as follows.
> >Let we allow adding proprietory comments in some agreed 
> format to the 
> >end of log messages.
> >Say,
> >	[<company tag>: <text>]
> >
> >In this case, instead of (winib 1234), we'll put [MLNX: 1234]
> 
> I can understand the issue with slow response.  But why not 
> do this in reverse?
> I.e. have your internal tree reference the windows SVN 
> version, and not the other way around.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> ofw mailing list
> ofw at lists.openfabrics.org
> http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ofw
> 
    
    
More information about the ofw
mailing list