[ofw] please stop referencing internal development trees in svnlogmessages

[Leonid Keller]

One more thing.
We usually add a patch in our tree, check it and then suggest it to the
community.
So it comes to WinOF several days later ... 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ishai Rabinovitz 
> Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2008 8:09 PM
> To: Sean Hefty; Leonid Keller; ofw at lists.openfabrics.org
> Subject: RE: [ofw] please stop referencing internal 
> development trees in svnlogmessages
> 
> We want to have a bi-directional pointers.
> 
> I cannot see what is the problem with an internal remark 
> added to the description.
> 
> Ishai 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: ofw-bounces at lists.openfabrics.org 
> > [mailto:ofw-bounces at lists.openfabrics.org] On Behalf Of Sean Hefty
> > Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2008 7:53 PM
> > To: Leonid Keller; ofw at lists.openfabrics.org
> > Subject: RE: [ofw] please stop referencing internal 
> development trees 
> > in svnlogmessages
> > 
> > >I believe, that not only we (Mellanox) are using internal 
> trees for 
> > >development and testing.
> > >The mentioned referencing is very usefull for maintaining 
> > >synchronization between the internal and WINOF's tree.
> > >So my suggestion is as follows.
> > >Let we allow adding proprietory comments in some agreed
> > format to the
> > >end of log messages.
> > >Say,
> > >	[<company tag>: <text>]
> > >
> > >In this case, instead of (winib 1234), we'll put [MLNX: 1234]
> > 
> > I can understand the issue with slow response.  But why not 
> do this in 
> > reverse?
> > I.e. have your internal tree reference the windows SVN version, and 
> > not the other way around.
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > ofw mailing list
> > ofw at lists.openfabrics.org
> > http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ofw
> >