[ofw] RE: [IPoIB] [Patch] adapter could be left in INIT state.

[Sean Hefty]

>Adapter has a chance to stuck in IB_PNP_PORT_INIT state if PNP events arrive in
>following order: first IB_PNP_LID_CHANGE or IB_PNP_SM_CHANGE - ipoib_port_up()
>called first time, then later IB_PNP_PORT_ACTIVE - ipoib_port_up() called
>again.

Is this possible with the IBAL 'event reporting' code?  (Nit: can we please stop
calling what IBAL does PnP?)  If this is possible, should the fix go into IBAL's
event reporting?

- Sean