[ofw] RE: WinOF 2.1 RC-1 workaround

[Smith, Stan]

Hefty, Sean wrote:
>> I thought if you didn't specify the name of the provider it would
>> default to ibal?
>
> The -i option requires an argument.  We can change the default
> behavior to 'install' by default with 'ibal' as the default provider,
> but that's not how it's coded with the latest updates.  I don't know
> that that's desirable though.
>
> - Sean

Backward compatibility is often a nice touch.